Numbers

The Numbers

Figures converted from Hong Kong dollars at historical FX rates — see data/company.json.fx_rates. Ratios, margins, and multiples are unitless and unchanged.

Futu trades like a fast-growing online broker that just had a breakout year, and the financials confirm the story rather than complicate it. FY2025 revenue grew 67.8% to US$2.93 billion, net income more than doubled to US$1.45 billion, and the operating margin reached an all-time high of 61.6% as a 89% surge in trading volume more than offset blended commission rates compressing from 7.8 bps to 7.2 bps. Despite this, the ADR trades at roughly 15.7x trailing earnings — slightly below its own 6-year average of 19x and a fraction of US peer Robinhood at 41x. The single metric most likely to rerate or derate the stock is client-asset growth in non-Hong Kong markets: international (Moomoo) brokerage commission jumped from US$170M to US$353M in 2025, and the durability of that ramp determines whether 2025's earnings power is the new base or a cyclical peak tied to Hong Kong / US trading enthusiasm.

Snapshot

The ADR last closed at US$159.89 on 2026-04-24. Client assets ended FY2025 at US$158.4 billion across 3.37 million funded accounts — both up roughly 40-66% year-over-year, the engine that drives commissions and net interest income.

What this company economically is

Futu is a digital broker-dealer for Hong Kong and overseas Chinese investors that has built a credible international (Moomoo) franchise in the US, Singapore, Australia, Japan and Malaysia. Two roughly equal revenue streams: brokerage commission and handling charges (US$1.35B in FY25, ~46% of revenue) and net interest income from margin loans, securities lending and bank deposits (US$1.34B, ~46%). Wealth management distribution and other services fill the remainder. Capital intensity is near zero — capex was US$7.0M in FY25 against US$2.93B of revenue, well under one-quarter of one percent.

Three legs to the chart: a 2020 inflection when retail trading exploded, a flat 2021-2022 plateau as Hong Kong markets deflated, and a 2023-2025 recovery that put FY2025 revenue at 6.9x FY2020. The operating-income line is the more important one — it shows operating leverage: revenue grew 67.8% in FY25 while operating income grew 112.3%, which is why margins broke out.

The breakout in FY2025 is real but largely operating-leverage driven: cost of revenue (clearing and exchange fees) and OpEx grew slower than revenue. Selling & marketing scaled, but R&D as a percent of revenue dropped from 11% to 8.4%. In other words, the platform now monetizes incremental users and assets at very high incremental margins — the question for FY2026 is whether commission-rate compression accelerates from here.

Quarterly direction

Eight straight quarters of sequential revenue growth, with operating income running ahead of revenue every quarter from 1Q24 onward. 4Q25 produced US$828M of revenue at a 64.4% operating margin — the highest quarterly margin in company history.

Is this a well-run business?

External quality and fair-value scores are not available for this run, so the scorecard below is built directly from the reported financials.

In two sentences: this is a high-margin, capital-light, debt-light platform with reinvestment optionality and the first sign of capital return. The one watch-item is that operating-cash-flow is a noisy signal at a broker-dealer because client-cash flows pass through it — the income statement is the cleaner read of underlying earnings power.

Cash generation — are the earnings real?

The chart is hard to read at face value because operating cash flow is dominated by changes in client cash deposits — when funded accounts swell, OpCF balloons; when they redeem (FY2023), OpCF can go negative even with strong reported net income. Net income is the truer measure of underlying broker-dealer profitability for Futu. That said, capex is so small (US$7M in FY25 vs US$1.45B of net income) that there is no question about reinvestment burdening the cash story — every dollar of accounting profit is structurally available to compound.

Capital allocation

Capital return is episodic: US$666M of buybacks 2021-2023 was opportunistic when the ADR was trading near book, then Futu paused and accumulated cash as profits inflected. FY2025 saw the first cash dividend (US$276M, US$1.95 per ADR), establishing a base policy. With US$16.8B in cash & short-term investments and capex of less than 0.3% of revenue, the company has substantially more flexibility than the recent payout suggests — a watch-item for a re-rating catalyst.

Balance sheet shape

The cash bar in FY2025 is striking: US$16.8B of cash and short-term investments, up from US$1.86B a year earlier. Most of that increase is client cash float — total client AP rose from US$15.1B to US$21.3B in 2025 — so this is not house cash that shareholders own. The cleaner read is total equity at US$5.14B (up 43% YoY), with US$3.34B in retained earnings, against US$2.22B of operational short-term debt (margin financing) and no long-term debt. S&P Global Ratings has Futu at BBB- (investment grade). There is no balance-sheet stress in this story.

Per-ADR economics

Per-ADR earnings have compounded at 95% per year over the past five years, and share count has been broadly stable at 140-152M ADRs since the 2020 follow-on. There has been no material dilution, and the buybacks of FY2021-23 partly offset stock-based compensation. Book value per ADR has grown from US$2.85 to US$36.34 over six years — a roughly 13x increase that is reasonable to compare against the ADR price move.

Valuation — current vs own history

The most important chart on the page. Despite the ADR more than doubling from US$80 at end-FY24 to US$160 today, the trailing multiple is essentially unchanged at 15.7x — because earnings doubled in lockstep. The 6-year (FY2020-FY2025) mean is 19.2x, the median is 16.0x. Current valuation is at the median, not the high. A reader who thinks the FY2025 surge is sustainable can comfortably argue the stock is mispriced; a reader who thinks 2025 was peak earnings has to accept that the multiple is already discounting some normalization.

Peer comparison

The valuation gap with Robinhood is the most telling comparison: Futu has higher operating and net margins, comparable ROE, similar revenue scale (US$2.9B vs US$4.5B), and trades at a P/E roughly 38% of Robinhood's. The standard explanation is China-exposure discount; the chart on the previous section says Futu has not been trading at much of a discount relative to its own history, which means Robinhood may be expensive rather than Futu being cheap.

Futu and Tiger sit in the upper-left "high margin, low multiple" quadrant; Robinhood sits in the upper-right "high margin, high multiple" quadrant. The market is paying very different multiples for businesses with similar profitability profiles.

Fair value range

Sell-side consensus most-recent target is US$212, bracketed by Citi at US$201 and Barclays at US$200 (cut from US$236 in March 2026) and JP Morgan high at US$270. The base case here at US$190 sits below consensus because it bakes in modest commission-rate compression; bull at US$237 requires evidence that the Moomoo overseas franchise can sustain US$353M+ of brokerage commission and continue expanding.

What to take away

The numbers confirm that Futu has built genuine, capital-light, high-margin profitability rather than a temporary trading-volume sugar high — operating margin reached 61.6% in FY25 with revenue diversified roughly 50/50 between commissions and net interest, and the platform earned US$1.45B of net income on capex of US$7M. The numbers contradict the popular "Chinese fintech with a regulatory cloud" framing: leverage is operational and small, the balance sheet has US$16.8B of cash (most of it client float, but the equity base is still solid at US$5.14B), S&P rates the company BBB-, and 32% of brokerage commission now comes from outside Hong Kong. Watch next: the 1Q FY2026 result (May 2026) and especially (i) blended commission rate vs the 7.2 bps FY25 print — anything below 6.8 bps says compression is accelerating — and (ii) overseas funded-account adds; if Moomoo international's US$353M of FY25 brokerage commission is annualizing toward US$500-650M, the bull case stops needing a multiple expansion to work.